ex officio
2009-01-01~
Difference between revisions of "Ratings and Recognition Committee"
From NASPAWiki
You are viewing a condensed mobile version of this NASPA webpage.
Switch to full version.
(→Agenda: Change tWL to NWL) |
|||
| (15 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | {{#naspa:committee-data|rr}} | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
== Agenda == | == Agenda == | ||
| − | The committee | + | The committee has the following items on its agenda: |
* Review the rating system and suggest future improvements | * Review the rating system and suggest future improvements | ||
| + | * Set the categories and criteria for official NASPA [[records]] and maintain the list of records. | ||
* Maintain a list of annual leaders in various recognized categories, and to periodically review those categories. | * Maintain a list of annual leaders in various recognized categories, and to periodically review those categories. | ||
* Assess the impact of raising the Local Club Tournament multiplier from 1/3 to 1/2 | * Assess the impact of raising the Local Club Tournament multiplier from 1/3 to 1/2 | ||
* Liaise with the [[WESPA]] Ratings Committee | * Liaise with the [[WESPA]] Ratings Committee | ||
| − | * | + | * Consider assigning new entrants into the NASPA [[NWL]] rating system with established NASPA [[Collins]] ratings their current Collins rating as an initial TWL rating, for the sake of symmetry and accuracy. |
== History == | == History == | ||
| − | + | We have archived information about our predecessor, | |
| + | the [[NSA Ratings Committee]], whose official webpage | ||
| + | is no longer available online. | ||
| − | == | + | === Activity criteria adjusted === |
| − | [ | + | The Committee has revised the thresholds for being listed as an active player in the official [[rating]] lists. Until June 2007, the requirement for TWL-rated players was one tournament game played in 12 calendar months; it then changed under the [[NSA]] to 28 games played in 24 calendar months; it is now 14 games played in 12 calendar months. The same activity requirement was also instituted for CSW-rated players; who had previously had no activity requirement. This change was motivated by a shift in playing patterns to events that are smaller and more frequent, as well as the now annual [[National SCRABBLE Championship | championship]]. |
[[Category:Committees]] | [[Category:Committees]] | ||
Latest revision as of 21:38, 28 December 2023
The Ratings and Recognition Committee is a NASPA committee. Its mandate is to ensure that the association has the best possible rating system and to recognize our player achievements. To contact the committee, please send an email message to ratings@scrabbleplayers.org.
Members
The following members currently belong to the committee:
2012-06-04~
2012-07-26~
2009-03-17~
2012-06-06~
2016-09-06~
The following members have served past terms on the committee:
| Chris Cree (SM) chair 2009-01-01~2009-08-21 | |
| Chris Cree (SM) 2009-08-21~2011-01-02 | |
| Chris Cree (SM) acting chair 2011-01-02~2020-07-30 | |
| Jim Hughes managing director 2009-03-17~2009-08-21 | |
| Jim Hughes chair 2009-08-21~2011-01-02 | |
| Jim Hughes inactive 2011-01-02~2012-06-05 | |
| Joey Mallick (SM) 2009-03-17~2010-04-16 | |
| Lynda Finn 2009-03-17~2012-05-12 | |
| Keith Smith (EX) recognition cochair 2009-03-17~2016-08-16 | |
| Shan Abbasi (EX) records admin 2010-11-19~2021-09-29 | |
| Dallas Johnson ex officio 2013-01-01~2015-08-15 | |
| Rich Baker ex officio 2016-11-29~2021-06-30 |
Agenda
The committee has the following items on its agenda:
- Review the rating system and suggest future improvements
- Set the categories and criteria for official NASPA records and maintain the list of records.
- Maintain a list of annual leaders in various recognized categories, and to periodically review those categories.
- Assess the impact of raising the Local Club Tournament multiplier from 1/3 to 1/2
- Liaise with the WESPA Ratings Committee
- Consider assigning new entrants into the NASPA NWL rating system with established NASPA Collins ratings their current Collins rating as an initial TWL rating, for the sake of symmetry and accuracy.
History
We have archived information about our predecessor, the NSA Ratings Committee, whose official webpage is no longer available online.
Activity criteria adjusted
The Committee has revised the thresholds for being listed as an active player in the official rating lists. Until June 2007, the requirement for TWL-rated players was one tournament game played in 12 calendar months; it then changed under the NSA to 28 games played in 24 calendar months; it is now 14 games played in 12 calendar months. The same activity requirement was also instituted for CSW-rated players; who had previously had no activity requirement. This change was motivated by a shift in playing patterns to events that are smaller and more frequent, as well as the now annual championship.