When you connect to this website, you send your IP address and sometimes some cookies. You may also give us personal identifying information, such as your name and contact information. All this data is used to securely provide you with the services that you request. We encourage you to review our privacy policy to make sure that you understand how your data is managed, and to contact us if you have any questions. View Privacy Policy

Difference between revisions of "Ratings and Recognition Committee"

From NASPAWiki

You are viewing a condensed mobile version of this NASPA webpage.
Switch to full version.

(Agenda: qualification systems transferred to International Committee)
(Agenda: new proposal for initial TWL ratings of Collins-rated players)
Line 19: Line 19:
 
== Agenda ==
 
== Agenda ==
  
The committee will have the following items on its agenda:
+
The committee has the following items on its agenda:
  
 
* Review the rating system and suggest future improvements  
 
* Review the rating system and suggest future improvements  
Line 25: Line 25:
 
* Assess the impact of raising the Local Club Tournament multiplier from 1/3 to 1/2
 
* Assess the impact of raising the Local Club Tournament multiplier from 1/3 to 1/2
 
* Liaise with the [[WESPA]] Ratings Committee
 
* Liaise with the [[WESPA]] Ratings Committee
 +
* Consider assigning new entrants into the NASPA [[TWL]] rating system with established NASPA [[Collins ratings]] their current Collins rating as an initial TWL rating, for the sake of symmetry and accuracy.
  
 
== History ==
 
== History ==

Revision as of 16:53, 19 August 2010

The Ratings and Recognition Committee was transferred from the NSA to NASPA in 2009.

The mandate of the committee is to ensure that we have the best possible rating system.

Members

The committee has the following members:

Former members

Agenda

The committee has the following items on its agenda:

  • Review the rating system and suggest future improvements
  • Maintain a list of annual leaders in various recognized categories, and to periodically review those categories.
  • Assess the impact of raising the Local Club Tournament multiplier from 1/3 to 1/2
  • Liaise with the WESPA Ratings Committee
  • Consider assigning new entrants into the NASPA TWL rating system with established NASPA Collins ratings their current Collins rating as an initial TWL rating, for the sake of symmetry and accuracy.

History

(to follow)

External links

NSA Ratings and Recognition Committee